Subramanya V.R vs Sundaresha H.C — 92/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section U,Sec,138NIAct. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM600001542023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
92/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
92/2023
Registration Date
05-04-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subramanya V.R
Adv. V.R.Natashekhar
Respondent(s)
Sundaresha H.C
Hearing History
Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 92/2023 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri, the court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-01 on cross-examination. The witness testified in a loan dispute matter where he claimed to have given a loan to the accused on 30-12-2022 along with a cheque, and alleged non-repayment. The witness further stated that the accused subsequently repaid the full loan amount only after the court case was filed. The court has adjourned the matter and summoned the witness to appear again on 06-03-2026 for further examination. No cross-examination objections were noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 92/2023 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri, the court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-01 on cross-examination. The witness testified in a loan dispute matter where he claimed to have given a loan to the accused on 30-12-2022 along with a cheque, and alleged non-repayment. The witness further stated that the accused subsequently repaid the full loan amount only after the court case was filed. The court has adjourned the matter and summoned the witness to appear again on 06-03-2026 for further examination. No cross-examination objections were noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts