Smt. Premaleela B Shetty rep. by her GPA Holder B Srinath Hegde vs D1- Smt. Shylaja — 5/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,7rule1ofCPC. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM600000182023

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

Filing Number

5/2023

Filing Date

18-01-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

18-01-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI

Judge

225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,7rule1ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Premaleela B Shetty rep. by her GPA Holder B Srinath Hegde

Adv. B.K.V

Sri. B Srinath Hegde

Respondent(s)

D1- Smt. Shylaja

D2- Sri. Rishyashrunga

Hearing History

Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

05-02-2026

HEARING

22-01-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

06-06-2023
Issue
28-06-2023
Deposition
06-10-2023
Orders
23-04-2024
Deposition
05-06-2024
Deposition
15-06-2024
Deposition
22-06-2024
Deposition
08-07-2024
Orders
31-08-2024
Deposition
14-10-2024
Orders

Summary The Civil Judge of Sringeri dismissed the plaintiffs' application seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to conduct a local survey of the disputed property. The court found that since a Commissioner's Report from an earlier suit (O.S No.6/2010) already existed in the court record and formed the basis of the current suit, appointing another commissioner would be unnecessary and appeared designed to unnecessarily delay proceedings. The limited defect regarding survey number could be addressed through corroborative documents or examining the existing commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Civil Judge of Sringeri dismissed the plaintiffs' application seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner to conduct a local survey of the disputed property. The court found that since a Commissioner's Report from an earlier suit (O.S No.6/2010) already existed in the court record and formed the basis of the current suit, appointing another commissioner would be unnecessary and appeared designed to unnecessarily delay proceedings. The limited defect regarding survey number could be addressed through corroborative documents or examining the existing commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case