Sri.Shridhara Adiga, aged 65 Yrs. vs Smt.Kamalakshi, aged 60 Yrs. — 13/2021
Case under O Section U,S,26,O,7,R,1,of,CPC,1908. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM510003952021
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
13/2021
Filing Date
23-09-2021
Registration No
13/2021
Registration Date
24-09-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri.Shridhara Adiga, aged 65 Yrs.
Adv. K R Suresh
Smt.S.D.Yashoda
Adv. K R Suresh
Sri.S.D.Krishnaprasad,
Adv. K R Suresh
Sri.S.D.Karthik
Adv. K R Suresh
Respondent(s)
Smt.Kamalakshi, aged 60 Yrs.
Smt.J.N.Swathi,
Smt.J.N.Shruthi
Smt.J.R.Prema
Smt.J.R.Shobha
Master J.R.Abhiram, Rept by natural Guardian Mother Smt.J.R.Shobha
Sri.N.S.Ravindra
Smt.K.S.Lalitha
Smt.S.R.Bhagyalakshmi
Sri.D.Ajith Kalkuli
Sri.K.S.Rajesh
Sri.J.L.Balakrishna
Sri.Laxminarayana Bayiri
Hearing History
Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
In Original Case No. 13/2021, on 08-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony from the 10th defendant's counsel (B.S.N.). The court admitted various documents including records from prior Case No. 20/2005, survey documents, and mutation records (M.R. No. H 4/2020-21) as evidence. The cross-examination of the witness by the plaintiff's counsel was completed, and the defendant's counsel was given time for cross-examination but declined to proceed, leading to the rejection of the cross-examination request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Original Case No. 13/2021, on 08-01-2026, the court heard witness testimony from the 10th defendant's counsel (B.S.N.). The court admitted various documents including records from prior Case No. 20/2005, survey documents, and mutation records (M.R. No. H 4/2020-21) as evidence. The cross-examination of the witness by the plaintiff's counsel was completed, and the defendant's counsel was given time for cross-examination but declined to proceed, leading to the rejection of the cross-examination request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts