N.R.Pura PS vs Mahesha — 106/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,331(4). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM510003792025

e-Filing Number

20-11-2025

Filing Number

106/2025

Filing Date

20-Nov-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

20-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA

Judge

1218-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0070

Police Station

N.R.PURA PS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,331(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.R.Pura PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Gadigeppa Basetteppa Nekara

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahesha

  2. 2.Dinesha

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case 106/2025 Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Mahesha and Dinesha) of charges under IPC Sections 305, 331(3), and 331(4), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of housebreaking, theft, and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. Key Finding: While the complainant reported stolen items worth approximately ₹70,000-₹81,000 from his home between August 6-15, 2025, inconsistencies in witness testimonies—particularly regarding which items were actually stolen versus remaining in the house—undermined the case. The investigative officer's evidence and procedural irregularities further weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  9. 23-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 10-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  13. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 03-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 03-Mar-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  18. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 24-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 24-Feb-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  24. 16-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 16-Feb-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  26. 03-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 03-Feb-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  28. 20-Jan-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  29. 06-Jan-2026

    ChargeView PDF

  30. 06-Jan-2026

    evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  31. 15-Dec-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura

  32. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 20-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 106/2025 Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Mahesha and Dinesha) of charges under IPC Sections 305, 331(3), and 331(4), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of housebreaking, theft, and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. Key Finding: While the complainant reported stolen items worth approximately ₹70,000-₹81,000 from his home between August 6-15, 2025, inconsistencies in witness testimonies—particularly regarding which items were actually stolen versus remaining in the house—undermined the case. The investigative officer's evidence and procedural irregularities further weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case