Sri. K.S. Chandrashekara. vs Sri. Vivekananda. — 317/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACM510003652023
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
289/2023
Filing Date
26-07-2023
Registration No
317/2023
Registration Date
09-08-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. K.S. Chandrashekara.
Adv. B.C.VinayShetty
Respondent(s)
Sri. Vivekananda.
The Manager, Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Bengaluru 560001.
Hearing History
Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court dismissed the insurance company's (Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.) interim application seeking dismissal of the motor vehicle accident compensation petition on grounds of limitation. The petitioner had filed the claim beyond the six-month period stipulated under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act 2019, but the court held that the Motor Vehicle Act being a beneficial legislation cannot deny benefits on technical limitation grounds, particularly where the claimant suffered serious injuries requiring two years of medical rest. The case will proceed to substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the insurance company's (Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.) interim application seeking dismissal of the motor vehicle accident compensation petition on grounds of limitation. The petitioner had filed the claim beyond the six-month period stipulated under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act 2019, but the court held that the Motor Vehicle Act being a beneficial legislation cannot deny benefits on technical limitation grounds, particularly where the claimant suffered serious injuries requiring two years of medical rest. The case will proceed to substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts