N R pura police vs Krishnappa aliyas Batru — 82/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 35,37,201,417,419,406,420,120B,323,506,34,. Status: NBW TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM510003142025

NBW TO ACCUSED

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

82/2025

Filing Date

17-08-2023

Registration No

82/2025

Registration Date

17-09-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA

Judge

1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 35,37,201,417,419,406,420,120B,323,506,34,

Petitioner(s)

N R pura police

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Krishnappa aliyas Batru

Manohara

Gangadhara

Hareesh

Kishore

Hearing History

Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA

06-04-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

23-03-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

10-03-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

NBW TO ACCUSED

06-03-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Orders

SUMMARY The bail application filed by Accused No.3 (Sri. Gangadhar) under Section 437 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected. The court found that the accused has been absconding since 2017 when the alleged offence of cheating and criminal conspiracy occurred, involving fraudulent acquisition of Rs. 94.5 lakhs from the complainant under the guise of a rice-pulling machine investment scheme. The court determined there were no sufficient grounds for bail, noting the risk of the accused absconding further and threatening prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The bail application filed by Accused No.3 (Sri. Gangadhar) under Section 437 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected. The court found that the accused has been absconding since 2017 when the alleged offence of cheating and criminal conspiracy occurred, involving fraudulent acquisition of Rs. 94.5 lakhs from the complainant under the guise of a rice-pulling machine investment scheme. The court determined there were no sufficient grounds for bail, noting the risk of the accused absconding further and threatening prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case