D.R.Gopalakrishna aliyas D.R.Gopal Represented by his GPA Holder B.S.Srinivasa vs Sri. K.Srinivasa — 7/2025

The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and confirmed the trial court's rejection of his application for temporary injunction. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate that the property's identity was clear, particularly since no revenue records were created based on the original 1942 grant to his father and the pakka phodi (boundary demarcation) had already been challenged and dismissed in an administrative appeal. The defendants' disputed ownership and possession of the land in Survey No. 159, combined with the plaintiff's inability to produce documentary evidence of continuous possession since 1942, rendered the injunction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.