Smt. Savithri, vs Sri. Annappa, — 184/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U.Sec., 166. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACM510001182025
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
15-05-2025
Registration No
184/2025
Registration Date
15-05-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Savithri,
Adv. B.C.VinayShetty
Sadana since minor Rep. by her NGM Smt. Savithri.
Respondent(s)
Sri. Annappa,
Sri. Sathyavelu,
Hearing History
Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
HEARING
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In MVC No. 184/2025 dated 27-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay. The court found that the first petitioner's affidavit testimony established the facts of the case as true, but upheld the dismissal because the second respondent had not filed any objections, rendering the delay condonation petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In MVC No. 184/2025 dated 27-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay. The court found that the first petitioner's affidavit testimony established the facts of the case as true, but upheld the dismissal because the second respondent had not filed any objections, rendering the delay condonation petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts