Smt. Savithri, vs Sri. Annappa, — 184/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U.Sec., 166. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KACM510001182025
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
15-May-2025
Registration No
184/2025
Registration Date
15-May-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Savithri,
Adv. B.C.VinayShetty
-
2.Sadana since minor Rep. by her NGM Smt. Savithri.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. Annappa,
-
2.Sri. Sathyavelu,
Case History
-
13-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
27-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary In MVC No. 184/2025 dated 27-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay. The court found that the first petitioner's affidavit testimony established the facts of the case as true, but upheld the dismissal because the second respondent had not filed any objections, rendering the delay condonation petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
09-Jan-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
06-Dec-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
20-Nov-2025
IssueView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
15-Nov-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
06-Nov-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
31-Oct-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
25-Oct-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
24-Oct-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
03-Oct-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
26-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
20-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
19-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
12-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
04-Sep-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
29-Aug-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
23-Aug-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
16-Aug-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
02-Aug-2025
For Objection
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
01-Aug-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
25-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
31-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 184/2025
Summary In MVC No. 184/2025 dated 27-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of delay. The court found that the first petitioner's affidavit testimony established the facts of the case as true, but upheld the dismissal because the second respondent had not filed any objections, rendering the delay condonation petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts