Dinesh Yane Rama Dinesh Ramappa vs Sadashiva — 17/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec.96,R/w.O.XLI,R.1. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KACM510000392025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2025
Filing Date
03-02-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
03-02-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dinesh Yane Rama Dinesh Ramappa
Adv. S Gururaj Aithal
Respondent(s)
Sadashiva
Smt.Laxmi
Chandravathi
Kusuma
Gowri
Shobha R
Chandravathi
Hearing History
Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
For Objection
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 26-02-2026 | For Objection | |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The Senior Civil Judge at N.R.Pura, Koppa allowed the appellant's application (IA No.III) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 15-day delay in filing an appeal against a property demarcation order dated 28/11/2024. The court found the reasons for delay—court closure during Christmas vacation and time needed to obtain certified copies—were genuine and bonafide, and accepted liberal judicial principles favoring justice on merits over procedural technicalities. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The Senior Civil Judge at N.R.Pura, Koppa allowed the appellant's application (IA No.III) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 15-day delay in filing an appeal against a property demarcation order dated 28/11/2024. The court found the reasons for delay—court closure during Christmas vacation and time needed to obtain certified copies—were genuine and bonafide, and accepted liberal judicial principles favoring justice on merits over procedural technicalities. The appellant was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts