Sri, Nagesh K S vs Smt. Ambika — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/s, 138 NI Act. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 17th March 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KACM500000312026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
224-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri, Nagesh K S
Adv. N.V. SUJAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Ambika
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 8/2026 The court, on 17.03.2026, recorded the sworn statement of petitioner Sri Nagesh K S, who confirmed that his main examination statement was complete and accurate. Evidence was admitted including: a cheque no. 315386 dated 24.11.2025 allegedly given by the accused (Exhibit 1), the accused's signature (Exhibit 1A), a bank return dated 26.11.2025 (Exhibit 2), a lawyer's notice dated 05.12.2025 (Exhibit 3), and postal receipts (Exhibits 4-5). The court ordered legal proceedings to be initiated against the accused based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Narasimharajapura
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
Summary of Case 8/2026 The court, on 17.03.2026, recorded the sworn statement of petitioner Sri Nagesh K S, who confirmed that his main examination statement was complete and accurate. Evidence was admitted including: a cheque no. 315386 dated 24.11.2025 allegedly given by the accused (Exhibit 1), the accused's signature (Exhibit 1A), a bank return dated 26.11.2025 (Exhibit 2), a lawyer's notice dated 05.12.2025 (Exhibit 3), and postal receipts (Exhibits 4-5). The court ordered legal proceedings to be initiated against the accused based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts