K.P.Purushothama Prabhu vs Deju Poojari Advocate - K.S. ADITHYA — 43/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/o 7 Rule 1 of CPC. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM410009632019

For Steps

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

43/2019

Filing Date

03-12-2019

Registration No

43/2019

Registration Date

03-12-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/o 7 Rule 1 of CPC

Petitioner(s)

K.P.Purushothama Prabhu

Adv. G.B.VENKATESH

Respondent(s)

Deju Poojari Advocate - K.S. ADITHYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

04-04-2026

For Steps

13-03-2026

For Steps

07-03-2026

For Steps

20-02-2026

Additional Written Statement

13-02-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

02-03-2021
Orders
05-01-2023
Orders
27-07-2021
Issue
29-06-2024
Orders
27-07-2024
Orders
28-01-2025
Orders
28-01-2025
Orders
16-12-2025
Orders

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. XIV) to implead Smt. Shalini W/o Ashok Deju Poojari as Defendant No. 5 in the property possession suit (OS No. 43/2019). The court found that the proposed defendant is a necessary party since defendant No. 2 sold 1 acre of the suit schedule property to her during the pendency of the suit without court consent, potentially affecting the outcome. The plaintiff was directed to file an amended plaint by January 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No. XIV) to implead Smt. Shalini W/o Ashok Deju Poojari as Defendant No. 5 in the property possession suit (OS No. 43/2019). The court found that the proposed defendant is a necessary party since defendant No. 2 sold 1 acre of the suit schedule property to her during the pendency of the suit without court consent, potentially affecting the outcome. The plaintiff was directed to file an amended plaint by January 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case