N.C.Ranganath vs Ravi K. — 376/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200CrPC. Status: AWAIT FOR RECORDS. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM410007322021

AWAIT FOR RECORDS

Next Hearing

07th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

376/2021

Filing Date

14-12-2021

Registration No

376/2021

Registration Date

14-12-2021

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 200CrPC

Petitioner(s)

N.C.Ranganath

Adv. D S SUDEER

Respondent(s)

Ravi K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

07-03-2026

AWAIT FOR RECORDS

30-12-2025

AWAIT FOR RECORDS

20-11-2025

AWAIT FOR RECORDS

15-10-2025

AWAIT FOR RECORDS

29-09-2025

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

13-07-2023
Deposition
21-07-2023
313 Statement
03-10-2023
Orders
21-09-2024
Orders
08-10-2024
Deposition
07-01-2025
Deposition
07-01-2025
Deposition
24-02-2025
Orders

Summary The court dismissed the accused's applications filed under Section 311 and 254(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act. The accused sought to recall witness DW-3 for further cross-examination and to refer documents (Ex.D1 and Ex.D2) for handwriting expert analysis to support his defense. The court found that DW-3's signatures were already available on record, the accused failed to establish sufficient grounds for recall, and allowing the application would unnecessarily prolong the proceedings filed since 2017. The case is posted for further evidence of the accused on 06/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the accused's applications filed under Section 311 and 254(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act. The accused sought to recall witness DW-3 for further cross-examination and to refer documents (Ex.D1 and Ex.D2) for handwriting expert analysis to support his defense. The court found that DW-3's signatures were already available on record, the accused failed to establish sufficient grounds for recall, and allowing the application would unnecessarily prolong the proceedings filed since 2017. The case is posted for further evidence of the accused on 06/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case