K. Manchegowda rept. by GPA holder H.K. Manoj vs K.T. Sridevi Advocate - K.M.PRASHANTH — 72/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/o.VII,Rule,1,of,CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM410005962023
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
72/2023
Filing Date
21-11-2023
Registration No
72/2023
Registration Date
21-11-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE
Judge
1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Manchegowda rept. by GPA holder H.K. Manoj
Adv. HAREESH SINGATAGERE
Respondent(s)
K.T. Sridevi Advocate - K.M.PRASHANTH
D.R. Duggappagowda
Adv. K.M.PRASHANTH
Hearing History
Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 08-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 28-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 72/2023, Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Mudigere Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' Interim Application (IA No. VIII) filed under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on grounds of improper valuation and insufficient court fee payment. The court held that such contentions regarding court fee cannot be decided at the plaint-rejection stage and must be determined during trial. However, the court allowed a separate application (IA No. IX) to frame an additional issue for trial on whether the suit was properly valued and adequate court fee was paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 72/2023, Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Mudigere Outcome: The court dismissed the defendants' Interim Application (IA No. VIII) filed under Order 7 Rule 11(b) of CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on grounds of improper valuation and insufficient court fee payment. The court held that such contentions regarding court fee cannot be decided at the plaint-rejection stage and must be determined during trial. However, the court allowed a separate application (IA No. IX) to frame an additional issue for trial on whether the suit was properly valued and adequate court fee was paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts