Sarojamma vs Jayamma — 59/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/O.VII,RULE,1,OF,CPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM410005232024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
18-12-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE
Judge
1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarojamma
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Respondent(s)
Jayamma
Suresh
Santhosh
Annappa Gowda
Lakshmamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S.59-2024, on 17.02.2026, the court recorded the sworn testimony of Plaintiff's Witness 1 (P.W.1). The witness confirmed the authenticity of the main examination statement and affirmed that all facts contained therein are true and accurate. The court admitted various documentary evidence including genealogical records (NP1), records of rights (NP2), land index (NP3), and multiple RTC documents for survey numbers 87/1, 87/3, 55/1, 156, and 55 (NP4-NP8), along with certified mutation copies (NP9). The case was adjourned for continuation of main examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S.59-2024, on 17.02.2026, the court recorded the sworn testimony of Plaintiff's Witness 1 (P.W.1). The witness confirmed the authenticity of the main examination statement and affirmed that all facts contained therein are true and accurate. The court admitted various documentary evidence including genealogical records (NP1), records of rights (NP2), land index (NP3), and multiple RTC documents for survey numbers 87/1, 87/3, 55/1, 156, and 55 (NP4-NP8), along with certified mutation copies (NP9). The case was adjourned for continuation of main examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts