Lakshmana vs Manjunatha alias Manjunatha Bandari Advocate - D. SIDDAIAH — 10/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 20,Rule,18. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 16th March 2026.

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KACM410004192024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

15-10-2024

Registration No

10/2024

Registration Date

15-10-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 20,Rule,18

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmana

Adv. U.M. Ashoka

Respondent(s)

Manjunatha alias Manjunatha Bandari Advocate - D. SIDDAIAH

Narendra alias Narendra Bandari

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Sunanda

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Prameela

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Manjunatha

Adv. A.B.S

Thippamma

Adv. K. VISHALAMMA

Yashodhamma

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

K.M. Dinesha

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

K.M. Chandrashekar

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Sundara

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Sharathchandra L.

Adv. D. SIDDAIAH

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

16-03-2026

Disposed

14-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

A.D.R.

10-03-2026

SUMMONS

07-03-2026

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC court at Mudigere allowed a compromise petition filed under Order 23, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code between petitioner Lakshmana and eleven respondents on March 16, 2026. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the settlement terms, and the court directed the office to draw up a final decree incorporating the compromise petition, which forms part of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC court at Mudigere allowed a compromise petition filed under Order 23, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code between petitioner Lakshmana and eleven respondents on March 16, 2026. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the settlement terms, and the court directed the office to draw up a final decree incorporating the compromise petition, which forms part of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case