Lakshmana vs Manjunatha alias Manjunatha Bandari Advocate - D. SIDDAIAH — 10/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 20,Rule,18. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 16th March 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KACM410004192024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2024
Filing Date
15-10-2024
Registration No
10/2024
Registration Date
15-10-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE
Judge
1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmana
Adv. U.M. Ashoka
Respondent(s)
Manjunatha alias Manjunatha Bandari Advocate - D. SIDDAIAH
Narendra alias Narendra Bandari
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Sunanda
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Prameela
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Manjunatha
Adv. A.B.S
Thippamma
Adv. K. VISHALAMMA
Yashodhamma
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
K.M. Dinesha
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
K.M. Chandrashekar
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Sundara
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Sharathchandra L.
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Disposed
HEARING
A.D.R.
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 14-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 10-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC court at Mudigere allowed a compromise petition filed under Order 23, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code between petitioner Lakshmana and eleven respondents on March 16, 2026. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the settlement terms, and the court directed the office to draw up a final decree incorporating the compromise petition, which forms part of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC court at Mudigere allowed a compromise petition filed under Order 23, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code between petitioner Lakshmana and eleven respondents on March 16, 2026. Both parties voluntarily agreed to the settlement terms, and the court directed the office to draw up a final decree incorporating the compromise petition, which forms part of the court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts