T.R. Gangadharaswamy vs Satheesh M.R. Advocate - K.C. Shiva — 8/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/o.XXI,Rule,34,35,39,of,CPC.. Status: Await orders from HighCourt. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KACM410003032024

Await orders from HighCourt

Next Hearing

27th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

8/2024

Filing Date

22-07-2024

Registration No

8/2024

Registration Date

22-07-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section U/o.XXI,Rule,34,35,39,of,CPC.

Petitioner(s)

T.R. Gangadharaswamy

Adv. G.N. DHANANJAYA

Respondent(s)

Satheesh M.R. Advocate - K.C. Shiva

Mallikarjuna M.R.

Adv. K.C. Shiva

Prathima

Adv. K.C. Shiva

Ushakumari

Adv. K.C. Shiva

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

07-03-2026

Await orders from HighCourt

03-01-2026

Await orders from HighCourt

08-10-2025

Await orders from HighCourt

27-09-2025

Await orders from HighCourt

26-09-2025

Await orders from HighCourt

Interim Orders

07-07-2025
Orders
07-07-2025
Orders

Court Order Summary I.A. No. III filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 of CPC - REJECTED. The court rejected the judgment debtors' application seeking permission to substitute the original security property (3 acres 10 guntas at Mudigere) with an alternate grocery shop property valued at approximately Rs. 6.97 lakhs. The court found that the judgment debtors' claim of facing problems conducting phodi survey was incorrect (as survey was already completed) and that the alternate property's value (Rs. 6.97 lakhs) was grossly insufficient against the decree amount of Rs. 29.25 lakhs. No costs awarded; matter awaits further directions from the High Court of Karnataka by 08.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary I.A. No. III filed by judgment debtors under Section 151 of CPC - REJECTED. The court rejected the judgment debtors' application seeking permission to substitute the original security property (3 acres 10 guntas at Mudigere) with an alternate grocery shop property valued at approximately Rs. 6.97 lakhs. The court found that the judgment debtors' claim of facing problems conducting phodi survey was incorrect (as survey was already completed) and that the alternate property's value (Rs. 6.97 lakhs) was grossly insufficient against the decree amount of Rs. 29.25 lakhs. No costs awarded; matter awaits further directions from the High Court of Karnataka by 08.10.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case