Mohammed Mazrul Haq vs K.S.Laxmana Gowda — 3/2020

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 21R11ofCPC. Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KACM410000202020

For Steps

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3/2020

Filing Date

16-01-2020

Registration No

3/2020

Registration Date

16-01-2020

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 21R11ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

Mohammed Mazrul Haq

Adv. K.M.PRASHANTH

Respondent(s)

K.S.Laxmana Gowda

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

04-04-2026

For Steps

07-03-2026

For Steps

05-02-2026

HEARING

17-01-2026

HEARING

18-12-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

20-02-2023
Orders
10-09-2024
Orders
05-02-2026
Orders

Summary: The court allowed I.A. No.4 filed by the Decree Holder under Section 151 of CPC. The Decree Holder is permitted to incorporate Survey No. 94/1 (instead of original Survey No. 94) in the sale deed being executed pursuant to the 2011 compromise decree, as the revenue authorities have since renumbered the property. The court rejected the Judgment Debtor's objections regarding procedural requirements (pakka phodi, 11E sketch, NOC from Tahsildar), holding that these technical matters do not impede the court's inherent power to ensure proper execution of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed I.A. No.4 filed by the Decree Holder under Section 151 of CPC. The Decree Holder is permitted to incorporate Survey No. 94/1 (instead of original Survey No. 94) in the sale deed being executed pursuant to the 2011 compromise decree, as the revenue authorities have since renumbered the property. The court rejected the Judgment Debtor's objections regarding procedural requirements (pakka phodi, 11E sketch, NOC from Tahsildar), holding that these technical matters do not impede the court's inherent power to ensure proper execution of the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case