SRI. K.V. BALAN. vs SRI. PRASANNA. S. — 2289/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/SEC.223,R/W,SEC.138,OF,NI,ACT.. Status: Balance by. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM400032492024

Balance by

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2289/2024

Filing Date

13-12-2024

Registration No

2289/2024

Registration Date

13-12-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Judge

222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/SEC.223,R/W,SEC.138,OF,NI,ACT.

Petitioner(s)

SRI. K.V. BALAN.

Adv. PRATHAP KUMAR. H.M.

Respondent(s)

SRI. PRASANNA. S.

Hearing History

Judge: 222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

10-03-2026

Balance by

07-03-2026

Balance by

13-02-2026

Balance by

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE

16-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

16-09-2025
Plea

Case Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 2289/2024) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, filed before the Chief Civil Judge and JMMC Court, Mudigere. The accused (Prasanna M.S., age 45) is charged with issuing a bounced cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 to the complainant (K.V. Balan, age 60) on 14.10.2024, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the accused's statement on 16.09.2025 regarding the charges, and the accused chose not to admit or deny the allegations, opting for trial instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary This is a criminal case (CC No. 2289/2024) under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, filed before the Chief Civil Judge and JMMC Court, Mudigere. The accused (Prasanna M.S., age 45) is charged with issuing a bounced cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 to the complainant (K.V. Balan, age 60) on 14.10.2024, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the accused's statement on 16.09.2025 regarding the charges, and the accused chose not to admit or deny the allegations, opting for trial instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case