Karnataka Gramin Bank Samse Branch, Kalasa Taluk. vs Sri. Hilari D Souza. — 141/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/ORDER,VII,RULE,1,R?W.SEC.26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM400030702025
Filing Number
141/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
141/2025
Registration Date
12-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karnataka Gramin Bank Samse Branch, Kalasa Taluk.
Adv. G.B.VENKATESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. Hilari D Souza.
-
2.SRI. S. Deepal Peter D Souza.
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
15-Nov-2025
Deposition
In case A.D. 141/2025, the witness was administered an oath on 15.11.2025 and examination-in-chief proceeded. Six documentary exhibits were admitted, including loan application, sanction memorandum, revival letters, bank account statements, legal notice, and postal receipts. The case was adjourned to allow further examination-in-chief to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
12-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 141/2025
In case A.D. 141/2025, the witness was administered an oath on 15.11.2025 and examination-in-chief proceeded. Six documentary exhibits were admitted, including loan application, sanction memorandum, revival letters, bank account statements, legal notice, and postal receipts. The case was adjourned to allow further examination-in-chief to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts