THE STATE BY MUDIGERE POLICE. vs VIJAYAKUMARA B P — 2151/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(2),117(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400030602024
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
e-Filing Number
03-12-2024
Filing Number
2151/2024
Filing Date
03-12-2024
Registration No
2151/2024
Registration Date
03-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE BY MUDIGERE POLICE.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIJAYAKUMARA B P
Hearing History
Judge: 222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Kannada court document (Civil Case CC.2151/2024) from the Principal Civil Court, Mudigere. The court examined Dr. Nagasimha, a 42-year-old physician, regarding injuries sustained by a patient on 04.10.2024. The witness testified that the patient had a severed fingertip injury, identified the injury certificate dated 14.10.2024, and denied defense counsel's suggestions that the injuries were accidental or that he provided a false certificate. No cross-examination of the witness was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Kannada court document (Civil Case CC.2151/2024) from the Principal Civil Court, Mudigere. The court examined Dr. Nagasimha, a 42-year-old physician, regarding injuries sustained by a patient on 04.10.2024. The witness testified that the patient had a severed fingertip injury, identified the injury certificate dated 14.10.2024, and denied defense counsel's suggestions that the injuries were accidental or that he provided a false certificate. No cross-examination of the witness was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts