EXCISE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE CHIKKAMAGALURU vs BHANU. — 2029/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section U/SEC.32,34,38(A),R/w,SEC.275,OF,BNS. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400027252025
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
Filing Number
2029/2025
Filing Date
14-08-2025
Registration No
2029/2025
Registration Date
14-08-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EXCISE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE CHIKKAMAGALURU
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
BHANU.
Hearing History
Judge: 222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Case No. C.C. 2029/2025 before the Principal Civil Judge, Mudigere Court (Karnataka). The court examined two witnesses in an excise-related matter dated 15.12.2025. Both witnesses testified regarding fingerprint identification, photographs, and documents, but stated they had no knowledge of certain materials and did not provide statements before excise authorities. The court recorded their testimonies and allowed cross-examination by the prosecution advocate, with no re-examination requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case No. C.C. 2029/2025 before the Principal Civil Judge, Mudigere Court (Karnataka). The court examined two witnesses in an excise-related matter dated 15.12.2025. Both witnesses testified regarding fingerprint identification, photographs, and documents, but stated they had no knowledge of certain materials and did not provide statements before excise authorities. The court recorded their testimonies and allowed cross-examination by the prosecution advocate, with no re-examination requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts