THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE. vs Anil — 1506/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506,326. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400021972024
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
30-08-2024
Filing Number
1506/2024
Filing Date
30-08-2024
Registration No
1506/2024
Registration Date
30-08-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Anil
Hearing History
Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Case C.C. 1506/2024 before the 1st Additional Civil Judge at Mudigere, the court examined testimony from a police officer (witness) regarding a statement recorded from a complainant (Chase-1) at M.G. Hospital on 10.04.2024. The defense counsel contested the witness's account, denying certain procedural details and claiming inconsistencies in the statement recording process. The court concluded its examination of the witness testimony and marked the relevant document as evidence (NIP-1(B)). No further cross-examination was ordered, and the case proceeded with the recorded evidence being admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Case C.C. 1506/2024 before the 1st Additional Civil Judge at Mudigere, the court examined testimony from a police officer (witness) regarding a statement recorded from a complainant (Chase-1) at M.G. Hospital on 10.04.2024. The defense counsel contested the witness's account, denying certain procedural details and claiming inconsistencies in the statement recording process. The court concluded its examination of the witness testimony and marked the relevant document as evidence (NIP-1(B)). No further cross-examination was ordered, and the case proceeded with the recorded evidence being admitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts