SMT. H.S. JAYALAXMI. vs MRS. ANUPAMA PARTHASARATHI. — 91/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/ORDER,VII,RULE,1. Status: For Objection. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM400018262025
Filing Number
91/2025
Filing Date
21-Jun-2025
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
21-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. H.S. JAYALAXMI.
Adv. M.V. JAYARAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRS. ANUPAMA PARTHASARATHI.
-
2.SRI. SANTHOSH.
-
3.SRI. PRADEEP.
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
12-Jan-2026
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
09-Dec-2025
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
28-Nov-2025
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
05-Nov-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
24-Sep-2025
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
23-Aug-2025
For Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
24-Jul-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
23-Jun-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: An ad-interim temporary injunction has been granted restraining the defendants from encroaching upon or interfering with the plaintiff's possession, cultivation, and occupation of the suit property. The court found the plaintiff's documentary evidence (RTC, mutation extract, and compromise decree from RA No.13/2021) sufficiently supported her claims and determined that denial of the injunction would cause irreparable injury. The case is adjourned to 24.07.2025, and suit summons with emergent notice have been issued to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jun-2025
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Mudigere
-
21-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2025
Summary: An ad-interim temporary injunction has been granted restraining the defendants from encroaching upon or interfering with the plaintiff's possession, cultivation, and occupation of the suit property. The court found the plaintiff's documentary evidence (RTC, mutation extract, and compromise decree from RA No.13/2021) sufficiently supported her claims and determined that denial of the injunction would cause irreparable injury. The case is adjourned to 24.07.2025, and suit summons with emergent notice have been issued to the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts