M/s. KARIBASAVESHWARA FINANCE, Rept. by its Prop. Smt. Chaitra. N. vs SRI. RICHARD. — 1192/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/SEC.200,OF,CR.P.C.. Status: NBW TO ACCUSED. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400017732024
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1192/2024
Filing Date
24-07-2024
Registration No
1192/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s. KARIBASAVESHWARA FINANCE, Rept. by its Prop. Smt. Chaitra. N.
Adv. B.T.NATRAJ
Respondent(s)
SRI. RICHARD.
Hearing History
Judge: 222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
Balance by
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED | |
| 19-01-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED | |
| 11-12-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-11-2025 | Balance by | |
| 16-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (CC 1192/2024) before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Mudigere, involving a cheque bounce complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The defendant is accused of receiving ₹8,00,000 from the plaintiff's finance company but returning only ₹1,99,350 through phone transfers, while retaining ₹7,90,650. Two cheques (₹4,95,000 each, dated 25.04.2024) deposited for repayment were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the defendant's statement on 13.01.2025 and sought his response on whether he accepts or contests the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (CC 1192/2024) before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Mudigere, involving a cheque bounce complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. The defendant is accused of receiving ₹8,00,000 from the plaintiff's finance company but returning only ₹1,99,350 through phone transfers, while retaining ₹7,90,650. Two cheques (₹4,95,000 each, dated 25.04.2024) deposited for repayment were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the defendant's statement on 13.01.2025 and sought his response on whether he accepts or contests the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts