SRI. AJITH. M.B. vs SMT. SHILPA. H.M. — 947/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/SEC.223,R/w,SEC.138,OF,NI,ACT. Status: Mediation for the Nation. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400013352025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
947/2025
Filing Date
28-04-2025
Registration No
947/2025
Registration Date
28-04-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SRI. AJITH. M.B.
Adv. D. SIDDAIAH
Respondent(s)
SMT. SHILPA. H.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 222-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Mediation for the Nation
Mediation for the Nation
Mediation for the Nation
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Mediation for the Nation |
| 12-02-2026 | Mediation for the Nation |
| 29-01-2026 | Mediation for the Nation |
| 21-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal case (CC No. 947/2025) filed at the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Mudigere, involving charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant alleged that the accused borrowed ₹6,00,000 on 11.02.2024 and issued a cheque (No. 000680 dated 22.12.2024) for repayment, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the accused's statement on 14.10.2025, and the case is now in the examination phase, with the accused's responses to the charges documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal case (CC No. 947/2025) filed at the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC Court, Mudigere, involving charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant alleged that the accused borrowed ₹6,00,000 on 11.02.2024 and issued a cheque (No. 000680 dated 22.12.2024) for repayment, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court recorded the accused's statement on 14.10.2025, and the case is now in the examination phase, with the accused's responses to the charges documented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts