THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE. vs Giridaranaika — 536/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 381,406. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM400009422024

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

e-Filing Number

03-06-2024

Filing Number

536/2024

Filing Date

03-06-2024

Registration No

536/2024

Registration Date

03-06-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Judge

223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 381,406

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Giridaranaika

Hearing History

Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE

06-03-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE

30-12-2025

EVIDENCE

28-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

23-09-2024
Charge
29-04-2025
Deposition
22-05-2025
Deposition
01-07-2025
Deposition
30-12-2025
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case: C.C. 536/2024 - 1st Additional Civil Judge Court, Mudigere (Karnataka) Outcome: The witness examination was concluded. The witness (Sachin, 36 years) testified regarding documents (NIP-10 and 11) containing his signatures related to a theft case involving gold ornaments. Cross-examination by both prosecution and defense counsel was completed. The court found issues with the witness's credibility regarding the circumstances of signing the documents, and the testimony was recorded with the witness's thumbprint impression. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

06-03-2026

Deposition

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: C.C. 536/2024 - 1st Additional Civil Judge Court, Mudigere (Karnataka) Outcome: The witness examination was concluded. The witness (Sachin, 36 years) testified regarding documents (NIP-10 and 11) containing his signatures related to a theft case involving gold ornaments. Cross-examination by both prosecution and defense counsel was completed. The court found issues with the witness's credibility regarding the circumstances of signing the documents, and the testimony was recorded with the witness's thumbprint impression. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case