STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE. vs Chandu A N — 462/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,504,353,332,323,324. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400007642024
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
19-04-2024
Filing Number
462/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
462/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Chandu A N
Hearing History
Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Kannada language court order from Case No. C.C. 462/2024 from the 1st Additional Civil Judge's Court, Mudigere. The document contains witness examination records for two PSI (Police Sub-Inspector) witnesses testifying in a criminal investigation. Both witnesses provided sworn statements about their roles in the investigation, evidence collection, and case proceedings. The defense counsel cross-examined both witnesses, challenging the veracity of their testimonies regarding investigation procedures and evidence handling. No substantive order granting/denying relief or bail was issued; this document constitutes the examination records only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Kannada language court order from Case No. C.C. 462/2024 from the 1st Additional Civil Judge's Court, Mudigere. The document contains witness examination records for two PSI (Police Sub-Inspector) witnesses testifying in a criminal investigation. Both witnesses provided sworn statements about their roles in the investigation, evidence collection, and case proceedings. The defense counsel cross-examined both witnesses, challenging the veracity of their testimonies regarding investigation procedures and evidence handling. No substantive order granting/denying relief or bail was issued; this document constitutes the examination records only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts