Banakal Police Station vs SUNDARESHA B K — 211/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 32,34. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400003342025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
07-02-2025
Filing Number
211/2025
Filing Date
07-02-2025
Registration No
211/2025
Registration Date
07-02-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Banakal Police Station
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
SUNDARESHA B K
Hearing History
Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
JUDGEMENT
For compliance
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 06-03-2026 | For compliance |
| 24-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 13-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this criminal case (C.C. 211/2025) before the 1st Additional Civil Judge at Mudigere, the court examined the testimony of PSI Nagaraj B.R. regarding a drug seizure case (FIR 67/2024 at Banakhal Police Station). The witness testified about the investigation procedures, seizure of materials on 25.10.2024, obtaining statements from various witnesses, and sending samples for chemical testing on 26.10.2024. The defense counsel disputed certain facts in the witness's testimony. The court completed the examination-in-chief and closed proceedings with no cross-examination recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this criminal case (C.C. 211/2025) before the 1st Additional Civil Judge at Mudigere, the court examined the testimony of PSI Nagaraj B.R. regarding a drug seizure case (FIR 67/2024 at Banakhal Police Station). The witness testified about the investigation procedures, seizure of materials on 25.10.2024, obtaining statements from various witnesses, and sending samples for chemical testing on 26.10.2024. The defense counsel disputed certain facts in the witness's testimony. The court completed the examination-in-chief and closed proceedings with no cross-examination recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts