THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE. vs Vinod Kumar R — 72/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304A. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM400001232025
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2025
Filing Number
72/2025
Filing Date
23-01-2025
Registration No
72/2025
Registration Date
23-01-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE BY BANAKAL POLICE.
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Vinod Kumar R
Hearing History
Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary This is a civil court order from the Court of the 1st Additional Civil Judge and Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mudigere (Case No. C.C. 72/2025) in Karnataka, documenting witness examination in a fatal road accident case. On May 24, 2024, a truck collided with an omni bus near Kottigehara, killing 4 people and injuring several others. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, victim identities, and vehicle details, while the accused (truck driver) contested the witness's account regarding speeding, negligence, and other factual claims. The court recorded extensive cross-examination statements from both the witness and accused's counsel, with no final judgment issued in this excerpt—the examination remains ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary This is a civil court order from the Court of the 1st Additional Civil Judge and Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mudigere (Case No. C.C. 72/2025) in Karnataka, documenting witness examination in a fatal road accident case. On May 24, 2024, a truck collided with an omni bus near Kottigehara, killing 4 people and injuring several others. The witness testified about the accident circumstances, victim identities, and vehicle details, while the accused (truck driver) contested the witness's account regarding speeding, negligence, and other factual claims. The court recorded extensive cross-examination statements from both the witness and accused's counsel, with no final judgment issued in this excerpt—the examination remains ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts