Sri. Jai Kumar Mathias Represented by SPA Smt. Elizabeth Mathias vs THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS CHIEF OFFICER TOWN PANCHYATH MUDIGERE — 24/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/SEC.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACM400000962026

Case disposed

Filing Number

24/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

24/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Judge

223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/SEC.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Jai Kumar Mathias Represented by SPA Smt. Elizabeth Mathias

Adv. C.K. Jagadeesha

Respondent(s)

THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS CHIEF OFFICER TOWN PANCHYATH MUDIGERE

Hearing History

Judge: 223-1ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDIGERE

06-03-2026

Disposed

25-02-2026

ORDERS

03-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the petitioner's date of birth (20.02.1980) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's claim credible based on supporting documents (Aadhaar card, transfer certificate, election identity card) and the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, as the respondent remained absent throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

25-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the petitioner's date of birth (20.02.1980) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's claim credible based on supporting documents (Aadhaar card, transfer certificate, election identity card) and the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, as the respondent remained absent throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case