Sri. Jai Kumar Mathias Represented by SPA Smt. Elizabeth Mathias vs THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS CHIEF OFFICER TOWN PANCHYATH MUDIGERE — 24/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/SEC.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM400000962026
Filing Number
24/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE
Judge
223-1Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudigere
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Jai Kumar Mathias Represented by SPA Smt. Elizabeth Mathias
Adv. C.K. Jagadeesha
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE REGISTRAR OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS CHIEF OFFICER TOWN PANCHYATH MUDIGERE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the petitioner's date of birth (20.02.1980) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's claim credible based on supporting documents (Aadhaar card, transfer certificate, election identity card) and the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, as the respondent remained absent throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
1Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudigere
-
25-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
1Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudigere
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 24/2026
Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Death Act, 1969, directing the Registrar to register the petitioner's date of birth (20.02.1980) and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's claim credible based on supporting documents (Aadhaar card, transfer certificate, election identity card) and the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, as the respondent remained absent throughout proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts