The PSI of Balehonnur PS vs Jagadish — 924/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.304(A),of,IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM300012632025
Filing Number
924/2025
Filing Date
22-Sep-2025
Registration No
924/2025
Registration Date
22-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Judge
221-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The PSI of Balehonnur PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jagadish
-
2.Thaja Saheb K
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
-
06-Feb-2026
ChargeView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 924/2025 | Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Koppа | Language: Kannada Charges: Two Junior Engineers (accused) are charged under IPC Section 304(a) (causing death by negligence) for the electrocution death of Mahadevappa, a MESCOM employee, on 23.04.2024. The first accused allegedly failed to warn of live power supply, and the second accused failed to secure proper electrical clearance and safety protocols before repair work. Outcome: Charges framed against both accused. Both accused understood the charges and opted for trial (pleaded not guilty). The case is posted for further inquiry/trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
-
09-Jan-2026
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
-
18-Dec-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa
-
22-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 924/2025
Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 924/2025 | Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Koppа | Language: Kannada Charges: Two Junior Engineers (accused) are charged under IPC Section 304(a) (causing death by negligence) for the electrocution death of Mahadevappa, a MESCOM employee, on 23.04.2024. The first accused allegedly failed to warn of live power supply, and the second accused failed to secure proper electrical clearance and safety protocols before repair work. Outcome: Charges framed against both accused. Both accused understood the charges and opted for trial (pleaded not guilty). The case is posted for further inquiry/trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts