The PSI of Balehonnur PS vs Jagadish — 924/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.304(A),of,IPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM300012632025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

924/2025

Filing Date

22-09-2025

Registration No

924/2025

Registration Date

22-09-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

Judge

221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.304(A),of,IPC

Petitioner(s)

The PSI of Balehonnur PS (Police Station)

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

Jagadish

Thaja Saheb K

Hearing History

Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

18-12-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

30-10-2025

APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Charge

Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 924/2025 | Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Koppа | Language: Kannada Charges: Two Junior Engineers (accused) are charged under IPC Section 304(a) (causing death by negligence) for the electrocution death of Mahadevappa, a MESCOM employee, on 23.04.2024. The first accused allegedly failed to warn of live power supply, and the second accused failed to secure proper electrical clearance and safety protocols before repair work. Outcome: Charges framed against both accused. Both accused understood the charges and opted for trial (pleaded not guilty). The case is posted for further inquiry/trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: C.C. 924/2025 | Court: Civil Judge and JMFC, Koppа | Language: Kannada Charges: Two Junior Engineers (accused) are charged under IPC Section 304(a) (causing death by negligence) for the electrocution death of Mahadevappa, a MESCOM employee, on 23.04.2024. The first accused allegedly failed to warn of live power supply, and the second accused failed to secure proper electrical clearance and safety protocols before repair work. Outcome: Charges framed against both accused. Both accused understood the charges and opted for trial (pleaded not guilty). The case is posted for further inquiry/trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case