Koppa PS vs Ravi G — 761/2021
Case under C Section U,sec.36(B),32,34of,KEAct. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM300010192021
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
761/2021
Filing Date
16-11-2021
Registration No
761/2021
Registration Date
16-11-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Judge
221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Koppa PS (Police Station)
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Ravi G
Kashinath
Manjunatha
Chethan
Hearing History
Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal case (CC No. 761/2021) heard by the Civil Court in Koper regarding illegal liquor transportation. On 02/09/2020, police received information about unlawful liquor smuggling in a Maruti 800 vehicle and conducted a raid, apprehending two individuals. The court examined witness testimonies and evidence, including contraband liquor bottles and cash seized from the vehicle. The court found inconsistencies in the prosecution's account of events and determined that the witness statements contained contradictions regarding the timeline and procedure of the raid, ultimately dismissing key aspects of the case due to insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal case (CC No. 761/2021) heard by the Civil Court in Koper regarding illegal liquor transportation. On 02/09/2020, police received information about unlawful liquor smuggling in a Maruti 800 vehicle and conducted a raid, apprehending two individuals. The court examined witness testimonies and evidence, including contraband liquor bottles and cash seized from the vehicle. The court found inconsistencies in the prosecution's account of events and determined that the witness statements contained contradictions regarding the timeline and procedure of the raid, ultimately dismissing key aspects of the case due to insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts