The PSI., Hariharapura P S vs Mahamad Rouf — 646/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s.354(D),354(D)(2),506. Status: FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM300009072024

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

09-08-2024

Filing Number

646/2024

Filing Date

09-08-2024

Registration No

646/2024

Registration Date

09-08-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

Judge

221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

FIR Details

FIR Number

0045

Police Station

HARIHARAPURA PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section U/s.354(D),354(D)(2),506
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section U/s.66(E), 67, 67(A),of,IT,Act

Petitioner(s)

The PSI., Hariharapura P S

Respondent(s)

Mahamad Rouf

Mohammad Irfan

Hearing History

Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

18-03-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

07-03-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

20-02-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

31-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

21-01-2026

FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA

Interim Orders

18-03-2026
Charge

Summary: Criminal case CC 646/2024 filed by Hariharpura Police against Muhammad Rouf A. Bin Abdul Razzaq (accused 1) for allegedly sharing intimate photographs of a woman on Instagram without consent and threatening to circulate them to her family and friends. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 353(D), 353(D)(2), and IT Act Sections 67, 67A, 66(E). The court framed charges against accused 1 after reading the charge sheet; accused 1 opted for trial rather than pleading guilty, and the matter was adjourned for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Criminal case CC 646/2024 filed by Hariharpura Police against Muhammad Rouf A. Bin Abdul Razzaq (accused 1) for allegedly sharing intimate photographs of a woman on Instagram without consent and threatening to circulate them to her family and friends. The accused was charged under IPC Sections 353(D), 353(D)(2), and IT Act Sections 67, 67A, 66(E). The court framed charges against accused 1 after reading the charge sheet; accused 1 opted for trial rather than pleading guilty, and the matter was adjourned for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case