Umesh. B.R. vs K.N. Anila — 723/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec,204,of,Cr.P.C.,. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM300008672022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
725/2022
Filing Date
03-10-2022
Registration No
723/2022
Registration Date
03-10-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Judge
221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Umesh. B.R.
Adv. T.D. PRASANNA
Respondent(s)
K.N. Anila
Hearing History
Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
EVIDENCE
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 13-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 07-03-2026 | A.D.R. | |
| 18-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Summary A Civil Suit (No. 723/2022) filed in the Principal District Court of Bengaluru was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the essential elements of the case, including the existence of a valid cheque for ₹3,00,000 and non-payment. The defendant's defense regarding "funds insufficient" was accepted, and the claim under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary A Civil Suit (No. 723/2022) filed in the Principal District Court of Bengaluru was dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the essential elements of the case, including the existence of a valid cheque for ₹3,00,000 and non-payment. The defendant's defense regarding "funds insufficient" was accepted, and the claim under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts