Balehonnuru P.S. vs Chinnaiah — 659/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec, 427,379of I.P.C. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM300007822022
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
16-08-2022
Filing Number
661/2022
Filing Date
16-08-2022
Registration No
659/2022
Registration Date
16-08-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Judge
221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balehonnuru P.S.
Respondent(s)
Chinnaiah
SURESHA
POORNESHA B G
NAGESHA
PUNITH
Hearing History
Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 17-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 18-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
This court order is in Kannada language and relates to case CC.659/2022. Based on the document content: Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief of a witness (Satish Chasa, 52 years old, businessman) on 10/10/2025 in a criminal case. Various evidence items including documents, photographs, and a weapon (axe/chopper) were identified and marked as exhibits (NIP 8-18). The court allowed the witness to be treated as a hostile witness and permitted cross-examination by the accused's defense counsel. No further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order is in Kannada language and relates to case CC.659/2022. Based on the document content: Summary: The court recorded the examination-in-chief of a witness (Satish Chasa, 52 years old, businessman) on 10/10/2025 in a criminal case. Various evidence items including documents, photographs, and a weapon (axe/chopper) were identified and marked as exhibits (NIP 8-18). The court allowed the witness to be treated as a hostile witness and permitted cross-examination by the accused's defense counsel. No further examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts