Jayapura P.S. vs RAJU — 98/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.,80,ofK.P.Act.,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM300001452023
e-Filing Number
21-02-2023
Filing Number
98/2023
Filing Date
21-02-2023
Registration No
98/2023
Registration Date
21-02-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Judge
221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0044
Police Station
JAYAPURA PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayapura P.S.
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
RAJU
RAJASHEKARA
MOHAMED AJMAL
NAGARAJA
SABITH
SRIDHARA
SANDEEPA U K
NUSHAD PASHA
RAVI KUMAR
RAVI
SHARATH P M
ANANDA D
SURESH
SUNDARESHA
BIPIN
GURU
SRIKANTH
SALEEM
THYAGARAJ
PRAKASH
UDAYKUMAR SHETTY
SHARATH
VIKKI
MANJU
SAYED JAVID
THEJAS
SRINATH
MOHAMED JABIULLA
AKBAR
POORNESH
RAVI KUMAR
MANJUNATHA
PRAVEEN KUMAR
CHETHAN
ANANTHA
Hearing History
Judge: 221-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted 23 accused persons of charges under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act (illegal gambling), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The key reasoning was that while police officers testified to conducting a raid and seizing gambling materials and money, critical witness testimony contained significant inconsistencies regarding the identity of accused persons, the amount of money seized, the exact location of the incident, and chain of custody of evidence. Additionally, the court noted absence of independent corroborating witness statements, raising reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually committed the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted 23 accused persons of charges under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act (illegal gambling), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The key reasoning was that while police officers testified to conducting a raid and seizing gambling materials and money, critical witness testimony contained significant inconsistencies regarding the identity of accused persons, the amount of money seized, the exact location of the incident, and chain of custody of evidence. Additionally, the court noted absence of independent corroborating witness statements, raising reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually committed the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts