Jayapura P.S. vs RAJU — 98/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.,80,ofK.P.Act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM300001452023

e-Filing Number

21-02-2023

Filing Number

98/2023

Filing Date

21-Feb-2023

Registration No

98/2023

Registration Date

21-Feb-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

Judge

221-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0044

Police Station

JAYAPURA PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.,80,ofK.P.Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayapura P.S.

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJU

  2. 2.RAJASHEKARA

  3. 3.MOHAMED AJMAL

  4. 4.NAGARAJA

  5. 5.SABITH

  6. 6.SRIDHARA

  7. 7.SANDEEPA U K

  8. 8.NUSHAD PASHA

  9. 9.RAVI KUMAR

  10. 10.RAVI

  11. 11.SHARATH P M

  12. 12.ANANDA D

  13. 13.SURESH

  14. 14.SUNDARESHA

  15. 15.BIPIN

  16. 16.GURU

  17. 17.SRIKANTH

  18. 18.SALEEM

  19. 19.THYAGARAJ

  20. 20.PRAKASH

  21. 21.UDAYKUMAR SHETTY

  22. 22.SHARATH

  23. 23.VIKKI

  24. 24.MANJU

  25. 25.SAYED JAVID

  26. 26.THEJAS

  27. 27.SRINATH

  28. 28.MOHAMED JABIULLA

  29. 29.AKBAR

  30. 30.POORNESH

  31. 31.RAVI KUMAR

  32. 32.MANJUNATHA

  33. 33.PRAVEEN KUMAR

  34. 34.CHETHAN

  35. 35.ANANTHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted 23 accused persons of charges under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act (illegal gambling), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The key reasoning was that while police officers testified to conducting a raid and seizing gambling materials and money, critical witness testimony contained significant inconsistencies regarding the identity of accused persons, the amount of money seized, the exact location of the incident, and chain of custody of evidence. Additionally, the court noted absence of independent corroborating witness statements, raising reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually committed the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    313 StatementView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  12. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  15. 07-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  17. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  18. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  19. 22-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  21. 07-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  24. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  25. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  26. 30-Aug-2025

    PleaView PDF

  27. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  28. 13-Aug-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  29. 16-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  30. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  31. 08-May-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  32. 03-May-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  33. 25-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  34. 17-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  35. 15-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  36. 23-Dec-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  37. 19-Dec-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  38. 30-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  39. 10-Jul-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  40. 20-Mar-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  41. 20-Mar-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  42. 27-Dec-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  43. 04-Oct-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  44. 25-Jul-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  45. 17-Jul-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  46. 16-Jun-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  47. 13-Jun-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  48. 26-Apr-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  49. 21-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 21-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 98/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted 23 accused persons of charges under Section 80 of the Karnataka Police Act (illegal gambling), finding that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. The key reasoning was that while police officers testified to conducting a raid and seizing gambling materials and money, critical witness testimony contained significant inconsistencies regarding the identity of accused persons, the amount of money seized, the exact location of the incident, and chain of custody of evidence. Additionally, the court noted absence of independent corroborating witness statements, raising reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually committed the alleged crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case