The PSI of Hariharapura PS vs Mohammad Irfan — 40/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.354(D),354(D),(2),506,of,IPC. Status: Framing Of Charge Or Plea. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Framing Of Charge Or Plea Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM300000852026

Filing Number

40/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

40/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA

Judge

221-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

Last updated 07-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

HARIHARAPURA PS

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section U/sec.354(D),354(D),(2),506,of,IPC
Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/sec.66(E),67(A),67,of,IT,Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The PSI of Hariharapura PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohammad Irfan

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    ChargeView PDF

    Summary: In Criminal Case No. 40/2026 before the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate at Kopppa, the accused Muhammed Irfan (age 23) was charged under IPC Section 506 for making criminal intimidation threats via phone call. The court framed charges against the accused, read out the charge statement to him, and the accused chose to proceed with trial rather than plead guilty. The case is posted for examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Koppa

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 40/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 40/2026 before the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate at Kopppa, the accused Muhammed Irfan (age 23) was charged under IPC Section 506 for making criminal intimidation threats via phone call. The court framed charges against the accused, read out the charge statement to him, and the accused chose to proceed with trial rather than plead guilty. The case is posted for examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case