Lakshmana S/o Kenchappa vs The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk — 893/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S,13(3),and,10(3),of,Birth,and,Death,Registration,Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KACM210069902025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

893/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

893/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

817-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section U/S,13(3),and,10(3),of,Birth,and,Death,Registration,Act

Petitioner(s)

Lakshmana S/o Kenchappa

Adv. M.O. JAGADEESH

Respondent(s)

The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk

Hearing History

Judge: 817-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR

07-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

ORDERS

16-12-2025

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

The court allowed the petitioner's petition under the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of the petitioner's father (Kenchaiah) dated 05.06.1976 and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's testimony, non-availability certificate, family tree, Aadhar card, and newspaper publications, particularly since the respondent failed to appear despite notice and no third party contested the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner's petition under the Births and Deaths Registration Act, 1969, directing the registrar to register the death of the petitioner's father (Kenchaiah) dated 05.06.1976 and issue a death certificate. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's testimony, non-availability certificate, family tree, Aadhar card, and newspaper publications, particularly since the respondent failed to appear despite notice and no third party contested the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case