Kamali Bai vs Lokeshappa — 699/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM210057652024

Filing Number

699/2024

Filing Date

19-Oct-2024

Registration No

699/2024

Registration Date

19-Oct-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

220-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rule,1,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamali Bai

    Adv. CHARAN NAIKA

  2. 2.M. Malleshappa

    Adv. CHARAN NAIKA

  3. 3.Gangadhara Naik

    Adv. CHARAN NAIKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lokeshappa

  2. 2.Roopla Naik

    Adv. MB

  3. 3.Krishna Naik

    Adv. MB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Judgment

    Case 699/2024 Summary: The court granted petitioners Kamali Bai, M. Malleshappa, and Gangadhara Naik a permanent injunction restraining respondents Lokeshappa, Roopla Naik, and Krishna Naik from interfering with petitioners' peaceful possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 275/2, 2 acres 30 guntas) in Chikmagalur district. The court found that petitioners had established legal ownership through revenue records (mutation entries under account MR.H4/2022-23), tax payment documentation, and uncontested testimony, while respondents failed to appear or challenge the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Deposition

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  14. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  15. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  16. 16-Jul-2025

    For filing written Statement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  17. 17-Jun-2025

    For filing written Statement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  18. 09-Apr-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  19. 11-Feb-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  20. 04-Jan-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  21. 21-Dec-2024

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  22. 04-Dec-2024

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  23. 12-Nov-2024

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  24. 21-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 19-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 699/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 699/2024 Summary: The court granted petitioners Kamali Bai, M. Malleshappa, and Gangadhara Naik a permanent injunction restraining respondents Lokeshappa, Roopla Naik, and Krishna Naik from interfering with petitioners' peaceful possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 275/2, 2 acres 30 guntas) in Chikmagalur district. The court found that petitioners had established legal ownership through revenue records (mutation entries under account MR.H4/2022-23), tax payment documentation, and uncontested testimony, while respondents failed to appear or challenge the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case