Kamali Bai vs Lokeshappa — 699/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,rule,1,of,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM210057652024
Filing Number
699/2024
Filing Date
19-Oct-2024
Registration No
699/2024
Registration Date
19-Oct-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
220-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE
Last updated 29-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kamali Bai
Adv. CHARAN NAIKA
-
2.M. Malleshappa
Adv. CHARAN NAIKA
-
3.Gangadhara Naik
Adv. CHARAN NAIKA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lokeshappa
-
2.Roopla Naik
Adv. MB
-
3.Krishna Naik
Adv. MB
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Judgment
Case 699/2024 Summary: The court granted petitioners Kamali Bai, M. Malleshappa, and Gangadhara Naik a permanent injunction restraining respondents Lokeshappa, Roopla Naik, and Krishna Naik from interfering with petitioners' peaceful possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 275/2, 2 acres 30 guntas) in Chikmagalur district. The court found that petitioners had established legal ownership through revenue records (mutation entries under account MR.H4/2022-23), tax payment documentation, and uncontested testimony, while respondents failed to appear or challenge the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Disposed
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
04-Jun-2026
Judgement
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
17-Apr-2026
Arguments
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
23-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
10-Dec-2025
Deposition
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
16-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
16-Jul-2025
For filing written Statement
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
17-Jun-2025
For filing written Statement
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
09-Apr-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
11-Feb-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
04-Jan-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
21-Dec-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
04-Dec-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
12-Nov-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
21-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 699/2024
Case 699/2024 Summary: The court granted petitioners Kamali Bai, M. Malleshappa, and Gangadhara Naik a permanent injunction restraining respondents Lokeshappa, Roopla Naik, and Krishna Naik from interfering with petitioners' peaceful possession of agricultural land (Survey No. 275/2, 2 acres 30 guntas) in Chikmagalur district. The court found that petitioners had established legal ownership through revenue records (mutation entries under account MR.H4/2022-23), tax payment documentation, and uncontested testimony, while respondents failed to appear or challenge the petitioners' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts