Singatagere Police Station vs Neela bai Advocate - HNS — 2247/2023
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 34,32. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM210033642023
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
28-07-2023
Filing Number
2247/2023
Filing Date
28-07-2023
Registration No
2247/2023
Registration Date
28-07-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
220-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
0014
Police Station
SINGATAGERE PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Singatagere Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Neela bai Advocate - HNS
Hearing History
Judge: 220-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 30-01-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 05-12-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 31-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED | |
| 17-10-2025 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: CC2247/2023, Date: 19-12-2024, Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge, Kadur A witness (Govindaswami, ASI, age 53) testified regarding a case involving an alleged false complaint filed on 01-04-2023. The witness identified documents and his signature on exhibits marked as "2B" and "6A". The court recorded the witness examination and adjourned the case to Case No. 11 for further proceedings. The respondent's counsel contested allegations that a false case was registered against the respondent regarding illegal liquor sales, asserting no connection exists between the respondent and the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: CC2247/2023, Date: 19-12-2024, Court: 1st Additional Civil Judge, Kadur A witness (Govindaswami, ASI, age 53) testified regarding a case involving an alleged false complaint filed on 01-04-2023. The witness identified documents and his signature on exhibits marked as "2B" and "6A". The court recorded the witness examination and adjourned the case to Case No. 11 for further proceedings. The respondent's counsel contested allegations that a false case was registered against the respondent regarding illegal liquor sales, asserting no connection exists between the respondent and the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts