KADUR POLICE vs KARTHIKA @ KARTHIK — 1492/2016

Case under Mines and Minerals(development and Regulation)act1957 Section 380IPC. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KACM210025332016

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1492/2016

Filing Date

29-09-2016

Registration No

1492/2016

Registration Date

29-09-2016

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

219-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KADUR

FIR Details

FIR Number

309

Police Station

KADUR PS

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Mines and Minerals(Development and Regulation)ACT1957 Section 380IPC

Petitioner(s)

KADUR POLICE

Respondent(s)

KARTHIKA @ KARTHIK

SHIVANDA @ SHIVU

VIJAY

RAGHAVENDRA @ RAGHU

LOHITH

Hearing History

Judge: 219-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., KADUR

02-04-2026

SUMMONS

18-03-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

29-04-2019
Deposition
16-08-2022
Deposition
16-08-2022
Deposition
10-01-2023
Deposition
10-01-2023
Deposition
11-06-2024
Charge
25-02-2026
Deposition
18-03-2026
Deposition

The court examined witness Lokesh (a retired PSI, age 67) on 18-03-2026 in civil case CC1492/2016 at Kadur court. The witness testified regarding his role in investigating a case from 2016-2017, stating he filed a chargesheet on 01.09.2016. The accused's counsel challenged the testimony, but the witness maintained his statements were truthful and denied filing false charges or giving false evidence; no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court examined witness Lokesh (a retired PSI, age 67) on 18-03-2026 in civil case CC1492/2016 at Kadur court. The witness testified regarding his role in investigating a case from 2016-2017, stating he filed a chargesheet on 01.09.2016. The accused's counsel challenged the testimony, but the witness maintained his statements were truthful and denied filing false charges or giving false evidence; no cross-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case