K.M.Prashanth vs Nagabhushana alias Siddappa Advocate - AMR — 356/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7Rule,1,ofCPC. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

Orders Next hearing 28-Mar-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM210022292023

Filing Number

356/2023

Filing Date

14-Jun-2023

Registration No

356/2023

Registration Date

14-Jun-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

220-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7Rule,1,ofCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.M.Prashanth

    Adv. S.N. GIRISHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagabhushana alias Siddappa Advocate - AMR

Case History

  1. 28-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  3. 28-Feb-2026

    Orders

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  5. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  8. 20-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  9. 08-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  10. 03-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  11. 26-Mar-2025

    Objections

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  12. 20-Feb-2025

    Objections

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  13. 04-Jan-2025

    Objections

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  14. 21-Dec-2024

    Objections

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  15. 07-Nov-2024

    Objections

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  16. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  17. 31-Aug-2024

    Issues

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  18. 13-Jul-2024

    Issues

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  19. 26-Jun-2024

    A.D.R.

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  20. 15-Jun-2024

    Issues

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  21. 18-Apr-2024

    Issues

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  22. 17-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  23. 04-Apr-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Original Petition 356/2023 dated 04.04.2024, the court examined various documents including orders from 27.04.2021, 31.08.2020, and 23.07.2018, along with e-gazette records and supporting exhibits. The court found that the petitioner lacked standing to maintain the petition due to insufficient written authorization, and accordingly dismissed the petition on this procedural ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 04-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  25. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  26. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  27. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  28. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  29. 08-Nov-2023

    For filing written Statement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  30. 26-Oct-2023

    For filing written Statement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  31. 04-Oct-2023

    For filing written Statement

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  32. 28-Aug-2023

    For Steps

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  33. 27-Jul-2023

    For Steps

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  34. 15-Jul-2023

    For Steps

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur

  35. 15-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 14-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 356/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Original Petition 356/2023 dated 04.04.2024, the court examined various documents including orders from 27.04.2021, 31.08.2020, and 23.07.2018, along with e-gazette records and supporting exhibits. The court found that the petitioner lacked standing to maintain the petition due to insufficient written authorization, and accordingly dismissed the petition on this procedural ground. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case