Umesh Kitthur vs Sinchana .S.A. — 1059/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KACM210016332024
Filing Number
1060/2024
Filing Date
06-Apr-2024
Registration No
1059/2024
Registration Date
06-Apr-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
219-Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Umesh Kitthur
Adv. K.R.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sinchana .S.A.
Case History
-
28-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
07-Feb-2026
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
13-Jan-2026
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
29-Dec-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
08-Dec-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
05-Dec-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
01-Dec-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
15-Nov-2025
Objections
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
12-Nov-2025
Arguments
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
17-Oct-2025
Deposition
On 17-10-2025, in Civil Case No. 1059/2024 before the Principal Civil Judge at Kadur, a witness (DW-1, Sinchan S.A., age 24) was examined under oath. The witness testified that he had no agreement with the complainant, did not provide any checks, and denied the allegations in the complaint regarding check dishonor. The court granted the complainant's counsel time to cross-examine the witness, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
25-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
31-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
30-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
26-Jul-2024
Plea
-
26-Jul-2024
313 Statement
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
25-Jul-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
25-Jun-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
11-Jun-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
06-May-2024
For Steps
Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur
-
06-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1059/2024
On 17-10-2025, in Civil Case No. 1059/2024 before the Principal Civil Judge at Kadur, a witness (DW-1, Sinchan S.A., age 24) was examined under oath. The witness testified that he had no agreement with the complainant, did not provide any checks, and denied the allegations in the complaint regarding check dishonor. The court granted the complainant's counsel time to cross-examine the witness, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts