Manu M., son of Manjunath vs Narasimha Murthy H., son of Hanumanthappa T. — 64/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KACM210010622026

Filing Number

64/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

219-Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manu M., son of Manjunath

    Adv. K.R.Gurupaadappa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narasimha Murthy H., son of Hanumanthappa T.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 64/2026 Summary The petitioner Manu M. submitted evidence including three checks worth ₹3,50,000 (check nos. 095651, 095653, 095654 dated 30.12.2025) from SBI Bank Santebennur branch, bank return memos, and a notice sent to the respondent on 09.01.2026 with postal receipt. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief and admitted documentary evidence marked as exhibits. The case proceeded with cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 64/2026 Summary The petitioner Manu M. submitted evidence including three checks worth ₹3,50,000 (check nos. 095651, 095653, 095654 dated 30.12.2025) from SBI Bank Santebennur branch, bank return memos, and a notice sent to the respondent on 09.01.2026 with postal receipt. The court recorded the petitioner's examination-in-chief and admitted documentary evidence marked as exhibits. The case proceeded with cross-examination of the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case