Suresh R. son of Ramappa vs Nagaraja N Son of Ningappa — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KACM210010602026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

219-Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CC

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh R. son of Ramappa

    Adv. DEVENDRA S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraja N Son of Ningappa

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Deposition

    Case Summary: 62/2026 On 16-04-2026, the Principal Civil Judge at Kadur recorded the petitioner Suresh R.'s sworn statement as evidence. The petitioner testified that he submitted a cheque (No. 212970 from SBI Doddagunte branch, dated 03.01.2026, for Rs. 1,00,000) and produced bank documentation, notice of service dated 17.01.2026, and postal receipts confirming delivery. The court admitted these exhibits into evidence and completed the petitioner's examination-in-chief, subsequently subjecting him to cross-examination by the respondent's counsel. The case proceeded with formal documentary evidence regarding the disputed cheque transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c., Kadur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 62/2026 On 16-04-2026, the Principal Civil Judge at Kadur recorded the petitioner Suresh R.'s sworn statement as evidence. The petitioner testified that he submitted a cheque (No. 212970 from SBI Doddagunte branch, dated 03.01.2026, for Rs. 1,00,000) and produced bank documentation, notice of service dated 17.01.2026, and postal receipts confirming delivery. The court admitted these exhibits into evidence and completed the petitioner's examination-in-chief, subsequently subjecting him to cross-examination by the respondent's counsel. The case proceeded with formal documentary evidence regarding the disputed cheque transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case