Smitha T.N. D/o Ningappa T.E. and Shanthamma V.B. vs The Birth and Death Registrar — 160/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S,13(3),and,10(3),of,Birth,and,Death,Registration,Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM210010342026
Filing Number
161/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
160/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
1085-III Addl CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smitha T.N. D/o Ningappa T.E. and Shanthamma V.B.
Adv. H.N. SUNILKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Birth and Death Registrar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Court Decision Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register Smitha T.N.'s birth date as 29.07.1992 and issue her birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and unchallenged evidence, established that the birth was never registered due to parental inadvertence, warranting late registration with prescribed fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
III Addl CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
05-Mar-2026
Orders
III Addl CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
28-Feb-2026
Notice
III Addl CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 160/2026
Court Decision Summary The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register Smitha T.N.'s birth date as 29.07.1992 and issue her birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and unchallenged evidence, established that the birth was never registered due to parental inadvertence, warranting late registration with prescribed fee payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts