Shashidhara N.B. S/o Beeregowda N.G. vs The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk — 112/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S,13(3),and,10(3),of,Birth,and,Death,Registration,Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM210008202026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
113/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
817-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shashidhara N.B. S/o Beeregowda N.G.
Adv. K.G. SUNIL
Respondent(s)
The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk
Hearing History
Judge: 817-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, KADUR
Disposed
ORDERS
NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 12-02-2026 | NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register the birth date of Shashidhara N.B. (born 12.08.2003) in the birth register and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register the birth within the statutory period due to inadvertence and ignorance, but accepted the petitioner's oral testimony and supporting documents as sufficient proof of the birth date, especially since the respondent authority remained unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register the birth date of Shashidhara N.B. (born 12.08.2003) in the birth register and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register the birth within the statutory period due to inadvertence and ignorance, but accepted the petitioner's oral testimony and supporting documents as sufficient proof of the birth date, especially since the respondent authority remained unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts