Shashidhara N.B. S/o Beeregowda N.G. vs The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk — 112/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/S,13(3),and,10(3),of,Birth,and,Death,Registration,Act. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KACM210008202026
Filing Number
113/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
817-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shashidhara N.B. S/o Beeregowda N.G.
Adv. K.G. SUNIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahashildar, Kadur Taluk
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register the birth date of Shashidhara N.B. (born 12.08.2003) in the birth register and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register the birth within the statutory period due to inadvertence and ignorance, but accepted the petitioner's oral testimony and supporting documents as sufficient proof of the birth date, especially since the respondent authority remained unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
27-Feb-2026
Orders
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.m.f.c, Kadur
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Case Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Registrar to register the birth date of Shashidhara N.B. (born 12.08.2003) in the birth register and issue a birth certificate. The court found that the petitioner's parents failed to register the birth within the statutory period due to inadvertence and ignorance, but accepted the petitioner's oral testimony and supporting documents as sufficient proof of the birth date, especially since the respondent authority remained unopposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts