KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK, VAKKALAGERE BRANCH vs MANJUNATHA — 197/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UO,VII,RULE,I,OF,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled in Lok Adalth on 14th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KACM200006842024

Filing Number

198/2024

Filing Date

20-Nov-2024

Registration No

197/2024

Registration Date

20-Nov-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR

Judge

218-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled in Lok Adalth

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section UO,VII,RULE,I,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARNATAKA GRAMIN BANK, VAKKALAGERE BRANCH

    Adv. H.M.RAJANNA,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJUNATHA

  2. 2.Smt. Nethramma

  3. 3.Smt. GOWRAMMA

  4. 4.Smt. Parvathamma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court accepted the settlement memo filed by Karnataka Grameena Bank against defendant Manjunatha before Lok-Adalath, finding no coercion or undue influence in the compromise reached between parties. The case was closed as settled with court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    A.D.R.

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  8. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  9. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur

  10. 20-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the settlement memo filed by Karnataka Grameena Bank against defendant Manjunatha before Lok-Adalath, finding no coercion or undue influence in the compromise reached between parties. The case was closed as settled with court fees to be refunded as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case