Ms. Pushpa U B vs Mr. A C Prabhu Rajshekar — 271/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section UO,VII,rule,1,of,CPC. Status: For compliance. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM200006792025
Filing Number
273/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
271/2025
Registration Date
15-Dec-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
218-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ms. Pushpa U B
Adv. G. MANUKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr. A C Prabhu Rajshekar
-
2.Mr. A P Pavan Chandra
-
3.Mr. A. P. Kiran Chandra
-
4.Ms. Arathi Sharat Kumar aliyas A. P Arathi
-
5.Mr. A. C. Niranjan
-
6.A N Chandan
-
7.A. N Charan
-
8.Mrs. A C Rathnamma, since dead Rep., by her legal heirs(Legal Heir)
-
9.Mrs. A C Anasuya, Since dead Rep., by her legal heirs(Legal Heir)
-
10.Mrs. A C Shashimukhi, Since dead Rep., by her legal heirs(Legal Heir)
-
11.Mrs. A C Poornima
-
12.Mrs. C R Babitha
-
13.Mrs C R Anitha
-
14.Ms. C R Kavitha
-
15.Ms. Himalaya Wellness Company, Rep., by its GPA holder Ms. Jayashree Ullal
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 271/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from alienating or creating third-party rights over the disputed suit schedule properties until final adjudication of the case. Key Details: Ms. Pushpa U.B. sought to declare partition deeds (dated 1965, 1973, and 2007) null and void, claiming her mother was defrauded of her rightful share in ancestral properties spanning hundreds of acres. The court found prima facie evidence through registered sale agreements from 2024 and a March 2026 sale deed executed during proceedings, establishing grounds for the injunction to prevent property disposition and multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
For compliance
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
24-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
07-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
01-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
26-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
24-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
23-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
04-Feb-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
06-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
19-Dec-2025
Objection on IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
17-Dec-2025
Objection on IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
15-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 271/2025
Case Summary: O.S. 271/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application ALLOWED. The court restrained defendants from alienating or creating third-party rights over the disputed suit schedule properties until final adjudication of the case. Key Details: Ms. Pushpa U.B. sought to declare partition deeds (dated 1965, 1973, and 2007) null and void, claiming her mother was defrauded of her rightful share in ancestral properties spanning hundreds of acres. The court found prima facie evidence through registered sale agreements from 2024 and a March 2026 sale deed executed during proceedings, establishing grounds for the injunction to prevent property disposition and multiplicity of litigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts