A. Sathish vs Ms. Sri. Ventures Land Developers India Ltd., Rep. by its Manager — 142/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/order,VII,Rule,1,R/w,Sec.26,CPC. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM200004872023
Filing Number
142/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
142/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR
Judge
218-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A. Sathish
Adv. M. Veerabhadraiah
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ms. Sri. Ventures Land Developers India Ltd., Rep. by its Manager
-
2.N. Venkatesh
-
3.Smt. Amrutha Venkatesh
-
4.V. Vasukishayana
-
5.M.J. Chandrashekara Shetty
-
6.M.R. Shankar
-
7.M.B. Shashi
-
8.M.B.Sathish Kumar
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
14-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
05-Dec-2025
Objection on IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
13-Sep-2025
Issues
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
28-Aug-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S.No.142/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's applications (IA I & II) for temporary injunction. The court found the suit prima facie barred by limitation regarding the registered sale agreement dated 26.12.2015, as the first legal notice was issued over three years after the 180-day performance period expired (limitation began 25.06.2016; notice issued 29.11.2019). While the plaintiff established a triable case concerning an alleged oral contract dated 15.06.2020, insufficient prima facie evidence supported granting interim relief, and the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Aug-2025
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
13-Aug-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
04-Aug-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
05-Jul-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
24-Jun-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
17-Apr-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
10-Mar-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
18-Jan-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
30-Nov-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
14-Sep-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
24-Aug-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
01-Jun-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
05-Apr-2024
Objection on IA
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
26-Mar-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
17-Feb-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
20-Jan-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
19-Dec-2023
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
28-Nov-2023
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
07-Nov-2023
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
25-Oct-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
04-Oct-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
19-Sep-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
17-Aug-2023
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Kadur
-
18-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 142/2023
Case Summary: O.S.No.142/2023 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's applications (IA I & II) for temporary injunction. The court found the suit prima facie barred by limitation regarding the registered sale agreement dated 26.12.2015, as the first legal notice was issued over three years after the 180-day performance period expired (limitation began 25.06.2016; notice issued 29.11.2019). While the plaintiff established a triable case concerning an alleged oral contract dated 15.06.2020, insufficient prima facie evidence supported granting interim relief, and the balance of convenience favored the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts